Judicial Reform Criticized for Ineffective Changes and Delayed Elections
The new judicial reform, which maintains popular election of judges and postpones the election date to 2028, is criticized for being an ineffective model that threatens the continuity of judicial functions. The changes are seen as an unworkable logistical solution.
La nueva Reforma Judicial no cambia la elección popular de juzgadores. Pretende resolver problemas de logística en la postulación y el sufragio judicial. Al diferir la jornada electoral al 2028 y reconfigurar los topes de candidaturas, el legislador confirma la inviabilidad del modelo original. Los “cambios” serán ineficaces y amenazan la continuidad de la función jurisdiccional.