Mexico's Supreme Court ruled that a new law that aimed to curb protest messages from criminal groups does not clearly outline the banned behavior, clearing the way for social protests to continue. Tabasco's government had defended the modification, stating it was intended to counter threatening messages from criminal groups.

Tabasco defendió que la modificación buscaba enfrentar mensajes amenazantes difundidos por grupos criminales; sin embargo la SCJN consideró que no delimita la conducta sancionada